A blog war has erupted among a few of the bloggers who participated in the Youth.SG blogging festival which I organised back when I was still at Youth.SG. As the guy who planned and executed the whole campaign, I do feel some sense of responsible to blog about this and hopefully mediate the situation. Then again, I am not too sure if my words are of significance. Nevertheless, here’s my attempt.
After reading through various blog entries about the whole incident by Ice-Angel, Nat, Mr Otaku and Voxy, here’s a short summary of what happened in a few simple steps.
1. Youth.SG organised a blogging competition in which one top blogger will get to win an Apple MacBook. To win, this blogger has to score the highest points in a scoring system which is 50% determined by judges and 50% public voting. A total of 20 top bloggers were selected to compete in the scoring exercise.
2. Mr Otaku emerged victorious and walked away with the Apple MacBook. Although he ranked 6th in scoring, he was able to win back points in public voting with his relentless campaigning effort.
3. In all competitions, there are winners and losers. Only difference here is this is a blogging competition – bloggers are by default more opinionated and willing to go public about their emotions. Hence two bloggers, Soupcanfairy and Issac made some remarks against Mr Otaku. Fair comment in my opinion since no vulgarities were exchanged.
4. Mr Otaku did not respond adversely to the comments (which I thought was a pretty mature thing to do – the winner should be gracious). However, his fan, Priss, a fellow blogger did.
5. Priss struck back against Issac and Soupcanfairy.
6. Issac and Soupcanfairy retaliated.
7. Mr Otaku decided not to be gracious anymore and stepped into the war as well.
8. The blog war incident got Tomorrow-ed, adding oil to fire.
9. Name-calling continues, flying all over the blogosphere.
10. Other bloggers who took part in the Youth.SG blog contest got affected as they are caught in the middle of a war between friends they know.
11. The war continues.
The way I see it, things could have resolved itself nicely at step 4 and 5. It takes two hands to clap. It’s okay to have your own opinion, okay to blog about this, okay to defend yourself, okay to debate. It’s not okay to resort to name-calling, not okay to engage in personal attack – not just because it hurts the other party, but also because it’s not helping you to win an argument and it’s not going to put you in favorable light.
To prove your stand, you need not have to prove that others have character flaws. You do not have to prove that their opinion is wrong (even if they were wrong, they are still entitled to have their own opinion). You just have to logically put across your own stand, and let others decide for themselves.
It’s that simple.
A case in point would be the Porn Comic Saga that occurred in this blog. The incident was reported on Tomorrow.SG, STOMP and Channel NewsAsia. It has the potential to erupt to a big furore, given the wider media exposure than the blog war incident – but it didn’t. Why so?
Simple – because the main party involved – my friend, Rachel, did not fight fire with fire. Did not engage in name-calling, did not try to discredit others (though others did that to her). She merely articulated her point.
The morale of the story?
Non-violent freedom fighter, Mahatma Gandhi said this, “An eye for an eye will only make the whole world go blind”. This has always been my guiding principle when I get into any conflict with others. I hope this saying is meaningful for whoever is reading this here now. π
I digress.
As mentioned earlier, the blog war could have been prevented at step 4 or 5 if either parties took a gracious step back. At the current stage it is in – things have already gone emotional rather than logical. It’s no longer about making a stand as to why which blogger deserves to win more – but rather, just personal attack against each other, pointing out supposed character flaws, one after another.
If this goes on, eventually, no one will remember how this started in the first place. Probably won’t even remember what they are fighting for – except that “if he slaps me, I must slap him back”. Never ending.
It’s easy to strike back, and harder to be gracious.
I do hope this whole incident can end in a civilised and gracious manner. Finally, I will like to leave you guys with a happy group photo of the bloggers taken during our last gathering:
Bloggers Unite! (photo taken from Nat’s blog)
Thank you for taking time to read my long, preachy entry.
Yours Sincerely,
Alvin Lim
Technorati Tags: blog war, blogging festival, singapore, youth, mr otaku, ice-angel, voxy, isaac, priss, xuan, gandhi, alvinology
π so sweet of you. well, it will be forgotten sooner or later.
* so sweet of you. well, about the blog war, it will be forgotten sooner or later .
Hi zelia! π
Prevention is better than cure. Where’s the cure?
Yeh, totally agree with you.
=(
“the blog war could have been prevented at step 4 or 5 if either parties took a gracious step back”
step 4 and 5 both refers to me… but the name callings aren’t started by me =( for the matter, i only blogged my opinion on name-calling *of the winner* (not to insult anyone or defend otaku)… kids nowadays really do have that “sore loser” attitude and poor sportsmanship…
youth.sg could probably help to educate youths on this issue.
Sadly, I feel a certain contradiction in your entry.
princess: Hi Sabrina, thanks for popping by my humble blog. Where’s the contradiction? π Can point it out?
Priss: Youth.SG is an online portal for youth, not MOE or their parents – while they can do more to promote good values (which is what they have been doing); whether the youths choose to listen or not is another matter.
BTW, I have already left Youth.SG and am speaking here in my own capacity as Alvin the dude.
I think I’ve said my piece. Anyway, it’s just my opinion, no hard feelings. π
Thanks Sabrina.
I think Priss and you got the intent of this blog entry wrong. I am not taking side or trying to pin-point the blame on anyone.
Most people tend to treat such incidents as ’cause and effect scenarios’ – where the incident has to lead back to A SINGLE point where there’s A SINGLE PARTY who supposedly is responsible for causing the whole incident…
which isn’t the case.
Like I said, it takes two hands to clap. π
Project this to a bigger scale – the Serbian-Croatian war, Israel-Palestine war, etc, its the same thing – You slap me, I slap you back, You kick me cause I slap you, I kick you back, etc. Neverending, and eventually, the war gets so personal that no one even remember what they were fighting for in the first place. Who was the one who supposedly ‘started the war’?
Hanor.
To be honest, I don’t even see the “intent” or “side-taking” of this entry. To me it just seems like an individual’s opinion of the situation.
However, I do feel a certain contradictions in the message that you’re trying to convey. But, it’s really no biggie. Like I said – no hard feelings.
errr…. okay lor, but I really see no contradiction lei. And you can put my name as Alvin on your blog lah, don’t have to use mystery ‘A’. π