![[Review] Yummy Christmas Menu at a Japanese Handroll Bar- Toku Nori @ Telok Ayer - Alvinology](https://media.alvinology.com/uploads/2024/12/Tokunorixjoelcaptures001-110x110.jpg "[Review] Yummy Christmas Menu at a Japanese Handroll Bar- Toku Nori @ Telok Ayer")
I had the honour of lunching with Dr Tony Tan two weeks ago (22 July), together with Mr Brown, Daphne Ling of Mother Inc, Ravi Philemon of The Online Citizen, Pat Law , Mr Miyagi, Dr Cherian George, Alex Au of Yawning Bread and Kien M. Lee.
The stated purpose of the lunch was as an informal, open discussion on how digital channels are transforming discourse and opinions locally and internationally. No press was invited, only bloggers who were deemed to be “trailblazer(s) in the online world in Singapore”. Not used to having such grand terms lavished upon me, I felt so flattered that I confirmed my attendance immediately.
The venue was at NUSS Guild House, nestled in the lush greenery of Bukit Timah. Food was great, so were the insights exchanged, mostly between Dr Cherian George, Alex Au and Ravi Philemon. The conversations leaned on heavier discourse of political and governance, save for the intermittent light moments injected by Mr Brown and Mr Miyagi.
The lunch was summed up with each person at the table sharing a piece of advice for Dr Tony Tan in his presidential campaign bid.
Wah… make me stressed. This dude with his iconic glistening comb-back hairdo was the head honcho of Singapore Press Holdings Ltd (where I work as a lowly employee) just a few months back. Now I am actually in the position to give him advice!
Anyway, here’s what I shared, though not exactly in the same words and order:
From a marketing perspective, a campaign is fundamentally about the message. A clear message will herald a successful campaign. Regardless of the platform used, be it newspapers, television or social media. These are merely tools; means to an end.
A good example will be the Worker’s Party’s “Towards a First World Parliament” slogan during the last general election. The WP were not the strongest in engaging the mainstream media, nor were they cutting edge in utilising social media. In fact, many of their candidates have no Facebook or Twitter profile till the middle of the election campaign. Yet with a clear message, Singaporeans were spreading their campaign messages for them, posting and sharing updates of their candidates like Chen Show Mao being seen in WP’s blue, taking the MRT train for instance.
We should not forget that there are real people behind social media and it is the human touch that is of essence. Beyond engaging the people with your intellect and credentials, I think it’s important not to forget the human factor, giving the people a real sense of who you are as a person. After all, just speak to the people around you and you will find the bulk of the electoral are not too concerned about highfalutin social, political or economic ideals, but more at the heart string level.
This applies to all the other presidential candidate hopefuls like Dr Tan Cheng Bock, Tan Jee Say, Tan Kin Lian and Andrew Kuan. I am keen to find out more about them on a personal level. In case I get accused of being biased towards Dr Tony Tan, I am open to dialogue sessions with the other candidate hopefuls too. I am sure the other bloggers are too. It’s just that Dr Tony Tan seems to have better PR support at the moment in engaging the local online community. 🙂
Technorati Tags: lunch with dr tony tan, dr tony tan new media, dr tony tan and bloggers, dr tony tan engaging bloggers, dr tony tan president, dr tan cheng bock presidential, tan kin lian president, andrew kuan president, tan jee say president, singapore presidencial election 2011, mr brown and dr tony tan, daphne ling and dr tony tan, alvinology and dr tony tan, ravi philemon and dr tony tan, alex au and dr tony tan, yawning bread and dr tony tan, pat law and dr tony tan, mr miyagi and dr tony tan, dr cherian george and dr tony tan, dr tony tan and kien m lee, nuss guild house, singapore politics, singapore president, singapore elections
My question is, after Tony Tan engaged you on the personal level, did he actually say anything of substance? Are we going to judge the candidates on how personal they are, how approachable, how they look, or we are going to look at the substance – clear articulation of their beliefs and positions.
In terms of this substance, Tan Kin Lian so far has been clearest. I can’t stop the feeling that with other candidates we are just getting dark horses.
I tend to agree with Kenny. TKL is the most upfront and open IMO. He gives you direct answers and replies with very little embellishment. One can decide to accept or otherwise. He is straight. That is more than I can say of the others, esp. TT. From day one he was bombastic but hollow.
Look at the current controversy concerning his son, Patrick Tan. In every answer and statement they have given to date you get a real feeling that some facts were embellished, somethings were incomplete – that there was no intention to level with you. You get the feeling that they feel high and mighty and need not be clear. You get the feeling they are playing games of the “catch me if you can” sort with you. Well, I got news, the onus is on the potential candidate NOT the voters to provide a clear honest picture. The price or prize is of course our vote.
Hi there mates, good post and good urging commented at this place,
I am really enjoying by these.